#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 UPGRADE#
#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 FULL#
#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 SOFTWARE#

This provides the ability to very quickly adjust photos without any brushing, building of lassos, or otherwise manually creating selections. In PL2 you can start by doing global (entire image) adjustments and then you can fine-tune your image using one or more Control Points. These are quite useful but theyвЂ™re not as fast and accurate for most purposes as Control Points. In ACR if you want to apply localized adjustments such as darkening the sky without affecting the foreground you have to use the Brush, the Graduated Filter or a Radial Filter, etc.

Either way, once you make exposure & color adjustments your edits are saved and the next time you view/edit the photo the same adjustments will be applied. In the case of ACR these sidecar files have an. These adjustments are stored in a sidecar file in the same folder with your photos. With PhotoLab 2, just as in Adobe Camera Raw, you can apply non-destructive exposure adjustments globally to entire photos. But with PL2 you can see a histogram by quickly switching from PhotoLibrary mode to Customize mode by just clicking a tab: For example, as I previously mentioned, with Bridge you have to launch ACR (which also opens Photoshop) before you can see a histogram. Some functions are done in one app and some in the other. One of the problems with Bridge/ACR is that these are two different pieces of software. So, I decided to do an in-depth comparison of the two to help me decide which options would provide the best workflow for my needs. And, if IвЂ™m going to switch there will also be a cost in terms of adapting my workflow. The most powerful of these additional features are вЂњLocal Adjustments.вЂќ Local Adjustments is PL2вЂ™s name for the Control Points ( U Point Technology) which allow you to very quickly create selections/masks which you can then use for selectively applying adjustments.ДЄt the same time, Bridge/ACR, together with Photoshop, provide powerful features that cannot be matched by PL2. Comparison OverviewДxOвЂ™s PhotoLab 2 avoids some of these problems while also providing some useful features that are lacking in Bridge/ACR.

#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 SOFTWARE#

IвЂ™ve also had problems with losing collections and keywords during software upgrades. This is settable in ACR but you have to keep your eye on it because it occasionally seems to change of its own accord. A more minor problem is the way that Bridge sometimes defaults to the sRGB color space or to a lower resolution version of your images. A major annoyance is BridgeвЂ™s limit of only two zoom levels. There are other major and minor annoyances.

Having a histogram directly in Bridge would also be helpful in selecting the best image from an exposure-bracketed series. And opening Camera Raw implies opening Photoshop which is not a speedy operation even on my speedy PC. This slows me down when culling images and checking to see if a portion of the image is blown out or blocked up.

There is no histogram within Bridge-you have to open Adobe Camera Raw (ACR).There may to be a workaround for this details below. And thatвЂ™s an extra step that slows my workflow.

#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 FULL#

But I don't always want the image at full screen size. If you click to blow the image up to 100% it then becomes sharp.

Bridge often displays blurry image previews, both in the Preview Window and when previewing full screen.

Not nearly as slow as Lightroom, mind you, but slower than Photo Lab 2, for sure. Adobe Bridge IssuesДЄt the same time, IвЂ™ve had some irksome problems with Bridge, including:

#DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS PHOTOLAB 3 UPGRADE#

Because I recently received a free copy of PL2 (along with my upgrade to the latest version of the Nik Collection) and because Bridge hasnвЂ™t received any significant updates in some time (none that are useful to me, at least) I decided to give PL2 a try. But now a new (to me) app, DxO Photolab 2 has me reconsidering my loyalty to Adobe Bridge & Camera Raw. I've tried Lightroom a number of times over the years but have always found it lacking (for my purposes). I've been a dyed-in-the-wool Photoshop user for years now and have never seriously considered any alternative workflow except Lightroom.

Dxo photolab 2 vs photolab 3